Read Christian Theology by Millard J. Erickson Online

christian-theology

Christian Theology has been revised to take account of changes in the theological world as well as changes in the intellectual, political, economic, and social worlds. Several sections have been added, including a new chapter on postmodernism. At other points the discussion has been updated, and some portions of the original have been condensed, since the issues they origiChristian Theology has been revised to take account of changes in the theological world as well as changes in the intellectual, political, economic, and social worlds. Several sections have been added, including a new chapter on postmodernism. At other points the discussion has been updated, and some portions of the original have been condensed, since the issues they originally dealt with are no longer as crucial as they once were. Also new to the second edition are a number of educational refinements, including chapter objectives, chapter summaries, and study questions....

Title : Christian Theology
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 9780801021824
Format Type : Hardcover
Number of Pages : 1312 Pages
Status : Available For Download
Last checked : 21 Minutes ago!

Christian Theology Reviews

  • Tim Cooper
    2018-10-26 21:14

    Although it took me most of the summer to read, I think this now replaces Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology as my 'go to' book for quick theological study. Erickson is very detailed in his study and makes some really complex issues approachable.

  • Bret James Stewart
    2018-10-19 18:13

    Erickson has done a reasonably good job with this book. It is an introductory survey of the major topics of systematic theology. On the positive side, he has done a phenomenal job in structuring this book so that it is easy to find information. He has reading questions at the beginning of each section that tell you what you are going to encounter, and he uses headings and sub-heading effectively to break up information into logical groups. His writing style is also approachable and is able to take sometimes highly esoteric matters and refine them so they make sense in the allotted space. As this is a survey, he can only skim the surface. It is difficult to balance the correct depth of information in a survey textbook.On the negative side, Erickson, although he seems conservative most of the time, sometimes imposes some inaccurate information or conclusions onto the text. The primary issue is he seems to have swallowed the lie that there are two "branches" of Christianity--a conclusion I vehemently oppose. The information is there that the Roman Catholic Church began as an amalgam of various forms of paganism with Christian trappings. Yet, either because he's been taught it and never questioned it or, perhaps, he wants to be PC, Erickson treats the Catholic Church as if it were a viable, legitimate "branch" or form of Christianity. In a similar manner, he also refers to other religions with Christian trappings such as the Mormons, thereby implying their doctrine valid from a Christian perspective. Both the Mormons and Roman Catholics have internally consistent (and sometimes ingenius) doctrines and dogmas. However, these are so far removed from biblical Christianity that they should be (and generally are, at least in the case with the Mormons) considered separate religions. I would not have expected this from Erickson, and it is somewhat disappointing. Such things "poison the well" for me because it makes me think that, if he is wrong in one area, might not he be wrong in others, maybe things I will not recognize. This shatters my trust and makes me feel I should question everything he says.I give him a so-so rating. The book is not throwaway, but should be read more critically than you would expect for a Christian survey.

  • Kim
    2018-10-16 16:04

    This is the text we have been using in Theological Foundations since September. I have looked at a number of systematic theologies over the years, but this is the only one I've used in conjunction with a class. I highly recommend doing so. Having accountability, the views of others, and the guidance of a professor motivated me to get the most I could out of the book. I love Erickson's writing. I have learned so much over the course of the past two semesters. He is thorough, detailed, and balanced. While there are some things I didn't agree with, I was thankful that I had been alerted to them. Since I began seminary, I have wondered what area I would like to really concentrate on, and I've come to the conclusion that my first love is theology as worked out from Scripture. This is definitely a book that I am sad to be finished.

  • Jacob Aitken
    2018-11-05 16:23

    This was the first systematic text I read. Admittedly, nine years ago I really couldn't evaluate Erickson's positions. I read his text in conjunction with Grudem's and the differences became apparent. Erickson studied under Wolfhart Pannenburg and as a result he is able to competently grasp many tough philosophical issues. (This is largely absent from Grudem). Since he is an evangelical, the reader can guess his positions on most topics. However, for the Calvinist reader a few things might be more interesting.1. He holds to inerrancy, albeit in a modified (and more sane) form.2. He mitigates Calvinism on two fronts: he places faith before regeneration and he denies limited atonement.2. Pace Pannenberg, he holds to a weird, intellectual view of the afterlife.The book is not without problems but it is a rich reflection on evangelical issues. It is unique in the sense that he is an evangelical familiar with Pannenberg and reflects on these tough issues.

  • Barry
    2018-10-17 17:15

    The strength of this book is the depth into which Mr. Erickson goes as he covers the main theological viewpoints on various topics. He does a great job of summarizing the various views, offering strengths and weaknesses of those views, and then offering his own final analysis as to which view he believes is the most Biblically sound. The drawback to this approach is that it is sometimes difficult to keep the views separated in one's own mind, causing some unnecessary confusion. Additionally, by the conclusion of several chapters I was exhausted by the amount of information and competing views and almost too tired to care which conclusion Mr. Erickson holds.In this book you will find a width and depth of theological viewpoints that enlightens and educates. Though sometimes dry, this is a very useful book to use when trying to gain a better understanding of the underlying reasons people hold various theological views.

  • Philip Christman
    2018-10-29 21:13

    I gave myself a year to work through the 1200+ pages of this book while trying to do justice to the text. it's taken almost that long, but was worth the time. Although completely evangelical, Erickson is unafraid to take less-than-majority opinions (it threw me that he leans to post -tribulationism). There is a constant emphasis on missions. best of all, this book is readable in a way that Strong's is not, and profound in a way that Bancroft's is not. I reccomend it highly.

  • Ruth
    2018-10-19 20:09

    Although firmly anchored within the Baptist tradition, Erickson presents all sides of each issue with clarity and balance before making his conclusions on each issue. Unlike much work in theology, Erickson's prose is light and readable throughout, making this a practical option for serious students as well as laymen.

  • Stacey
    2018-10-24 13:07

    Even though I was in seminary and have had several years of Bible teaching, this book was written in a language that many could understand. I appreciated the unbiased presentation of different perspectives.

  • Erik Spohr
    2018-11-01 16:00

    An excellent - christian - systematic theology. Erickson is evenhanded, applies greater levels of philosophy than other protestant theologians, and deals fairly with those with whom he disagrees.

  • C.J. Moore
    2018-10-28 17:16

    It's not perfect, but it's one of my favorites. I don't agree with a lot of Erickson's theological leanings, but he treats most positions fairly throughout the book before writing on his own. J.I. Packer calls it "gently Calvinistic." I think that's going a bit too far, myself. Even so, be sure to add this one to your shelf. Will make for good reference (for me) for years to come.

  • Steve Campbell
    2018-10-27 13:23

    This is a thorough, comprehensive, and reasoned examination of the basic theology of Christianity. While it is aimed toward theology students in college and seminary, it is accessible to any serious Christian who has a thirst for the knowledge of God and his ways.

  • Jason Hoke
    2018-11-12 17:16

    I always read a theology book with a highlighter. This one though is 70% what others believe and 20% of why they are wrong with 10% on his view to wrap things up. Probably my least favorite of the Theology books I have reviewed.

  • John Rimmer
    2018-11-04 15:22

    I'd recommend Grudem before Erickson, but who cares what I say.

  • Krista Dominguez
    2018-10-23 17:03

    While I don't agree with all of Erickson's conclusions, this is an excellent systematic theology textbook.

  • Brent McCulley
    2018-11-14 19:17

    My first systematic theology finally completely read from cover to cover! What a refreshing feeling closing this after reading the last page after several months of wrestling with Millard J. Erickson's treatment in Christian Theology. Let me begin by saying obviously I don't agree with all of Erickson's thought--who would? As a systematic theology, the systematizer does the painstaking job at putting his theology into a coherent system, and as such, it reflects Erickson's system, and not someone else's system. Even still, I find so much fruit in reading through systematic theology from cover to cover, and so getting into the mind of the systematizer, knowing his system from in and out. Erickson challenged me, brought new depth of insight onto beautiful and powerful doctrines, and encouraged me all the way.Erickson is thoroughly evangelical and unapologetically Baptistic. Having studied under Wolfhart Pannenberg for his post-doctorate degree, his systematic reflects a robust philosophical angle that systematic theologies have hitherto left uncharted. This is especially true in his first section dealing with the nature of reality, knowledge, truth, and his treatment of Divine inspiration and the inerrancy of the Bible. He wrestles with the philosophies of the modernist and post-modernist world in a vigorous way that leaves the reader equipped with a system that is philosophically durable as it is theologically evangelical.Erickson's treatment of Christology and theology proper is extensive and thorough--grappling with the Nicene Church Fathers and wrestling down the post-modern theologians. In fine, he offers a bold and tenable understanding of doctrines such as the incarnation that are thoroughly orthodox, yet tenable and evangelical. Erickson's helpful analogies aid the reader in getting into the heart of his system, and proved to be workable and orthodox, especially in understanding Christ's dual natures and dual wills post incarnation. Erickson's development of explaining the Kenosis of Christ was especially helpful, and gave me a running analogy that I'll utilize in the future.Erickson's treatment on divine foreknowledge is more philosophical than theological, as he calls his position "Moderate Calvinism" albeit it is merely a modified Molinistic model whereby he appeals to God actualizing a world wherein God's knowledge of what creature would do given any circumstance, thereby allowing for a greater libertarian sense of freedom. Hence, Erickson puts God's knowledge of what free creatures would do (counter-factuals) right in between His knowledge of what any free creature will do and could do. Thus, Erickson still denies that humans have true power of contrary choice on an equal level--a philosophical presupposition he charges is simply untenable unless one resorts to a type of open theism of temporal ontology--but he nevertheless states that although a free creature could do option B over option A in any given circumstance, God actualizes the world where He knows the free creature would always choose option A over option B, etc.Erickson sets up his understanding of divine sovereignty and human freedom quite nicely insofar as it flows right into his understanding of the atonement which he concedes is universal, albeit salvation is still particular because the application of the universal atonement is only applicable to the elect. Erickson allows this by taking on Augustus H. Strong's view of God's predestination, namely, sublapsarianism which states that God's causal decree to provide salvation is logically antecedent to His decree to save some and not others. Erickson's understanding of eschatology is rather short, given the extensive treatment on other doctrines, but he holds to the traditional understanding of premillenialism, that is to say historic and post-tribulational.Much more could be said about Eickson's Christian Theology, but suffice it to say I am very pleased and thrilled to have dove into this systematic, and look forward to reading more in the near future. My goal is to finish Calvin's Institutes and then pick up Berkhof's Systematic Theology next. Erickson's systematic will serve as an excellent resource to utilize for all future theological projects forthcoming; grateful to have read this and to always have this sitting on the shelf henceforth.Brent McCulley

  • Michael Dunlop
    2018-11-08 18:17

    Overall, it's a decent theology, but I don’t think it deserves as widespread usage as it receives in conservative Baptist seminaries today. In general, I think I prefer Grudem and others (even McCune if you want a very baptist and dispensational perspective). Pros: I liked Erickson’s handling of Soteriology, especially Election (chapter’s 43-45 coupled with chapter 15 “God’s plan”). Erickson is one of just a few people to incorporate Molinism into his understanding of pretemporal, unconditional election without becoming Arminian (Bruce Ware is another).Cons: I found his ecclesiology section to be weak. Though I agree with his general conclusions (Baptist church polity) I didn’t think his arguments were very strong. I probably walked away from the book less convinced of his view that when I began…I also had issues with his section on eschatology, mostly with regard to his understanding of dispensationalism. He is a posttribulational premillennialist, and that’s fine. I don’t care necessarily that he rejects dispensational pretribulationalism. My issue is that he has a very dated view of dispensationalism. Not only does he fail to mention the welcome and needed advancements of progressive dispensationalism (80’s — today), his understanding of dispensationalism barely even reflects the “revised” era of dispensationalism (60’s — somewhat today). The dispensationalism that he picks apart is mostly of the “classic” era (Scofield, Chaffer, etc.), which no serious dispensational theologian (that I know of) holds to anymore. A few examples: He speaks of the dispensational division between the “kingdom of God” and the “kingdom of Heaven” (1068). He talks about dispensational interpreters interpreting Song of Solomon as a “picture of Christ’s love for the Church” (1067). He mentions Matthew 24:39-44 (“one will be taken and the other left”) as being a proof-text for pretribulationalists (1119). Each of these examples are of views held long ago by dispensationalists, and held by virtually none today (whether progressive or even revised/traditional). It’s simply not honest scholarship.

  • Marcus
    2018-10-29 17:05

    Substance: 3/5Readability: 4/5This is my second Systematic Theology text (first was Wayne Grudem's), so I will not presume to speak intelligibly on where Erickson's work fits in the grand scheme of ST. The Good: The ideas he put forth were done in a clear, proper manner. Where ideas were less complicated, Erickson used analogies and metaphors to help illustrate the point. I didn't agree with him on everything, but overall his opinions are predictable and evangelical. I knew from where he was coming and understood mostly why he believes what he does. As another reviewer put it, "Erickson is: robustly evangelical, essentially conservative and gently Calvinistic." Again, not that I agree with everything he says, but it's reassuring to read something through which you can grab a well-reasoned presentation of the author's opinion. The Bad: Erickson tended to make sharp, "assumed" statements that, I feel, cannot necessarily be assumed (opinions on heaven/hell, gifts of the Spirit, etc). When such statements occurred, there were no footnotes, explanation, or even guidance to another chapter in the book. Too often I felt I were "left hanging." The book was wholesome, well organized, and, personally, a great "second Systematic Theology text" to read. Nothing "outstanding," but nothing "horrible" either.DISCLAIMER: I only worked through Erickson's chapters on Creation, Providence, Evil, Image of God, Sin, and Christology (chps. 16-39).

  • Dav
    2018-11-02 16:11

    Christian Theologyby Millard J. Erickson"Leading evangelical scholar Millard Erickson offers a new edition of his bestselling textbook, now substantially updated and revised throughout. This edition takes into account feedback from professors and students and reflects current theological conversations, with added material on the atonement, justification, and divine foreknowledge. Erickson's comprehensive introduction is biblical, contemporary, moderate, and fair to various positions, and it applies doctrine to Christian life and ministry." Baker Publishing GroupEndorsement"Millard Erickson's Christian Theology has established itself as the most widely used and most generally useful of modern Protestant surveys of Christian truth. Robustly evangelical, essentially conservative, thoroughly contemporary, firmly Baptist, gently Calvinistic, and cautiously post-tribulationist premillennial, its fair-minded breadth and meticulous analysis of options have won it consistent praise. Now updated, augmented, and provided with study aids, its usefulness as a text for students and a resource for pastors and lay leaders will be even greater. It is altogether a masterly piece of work."J. I. Packer, Board of Governors Professor of Theology, Regent College

  • Chris
    2018-11-14 12:57

    This was the primary textbook for both of my Systematic Theology classes at NOBTS. While this isn't the type of book one would read straight through (I certainly didn't!) one could read over a period of time, or read certain sections as needed. Erickson is conservative in his theological viewpoint, but more moderate on the issues than Grudem, and I think Erickson did a good job fairly representing other theological points of view. His discussions delve into the philosophical more than Grudem, so having a background in philosophy of religion would be more helpful in reading Erickson. The book is well organized, and proceeds logically by answering the question of what is Theology before delving into doctrines of the Word, God, Man, the Trinity, Jesus before moving into soteriology, eccliesiolgy, and eschatology. I enjoyed reading this very much and will certainly be consulting in the future.

  • Jacob Park
    2018-11-02 13:20

    I'm not going to analyze the content of this book in this review. I'd highly recommend that you analyze it while reading it yourself. It's very thick but highly readable.We used this as a textbook (along with Berkhof) for Dr. Packer's Systematic Overview class at Regent in the early 2000's. As he put it, Erickson is: robustly evangelical, essentially conservative and gently Calvinistic. It's a very good overview of what Christians, that are not highly skewed to the right or the left, have believed through the ages.I really wish that the mainstream media would read books such as this before making proclamations about Christianity, I also hope Christians are up to date on world/social matters before making any proclamations about what is going on in the world today.All in all, this book is a must read for anyone who is serious about learning about the Christian faith.

  • Alex Fardi-turkmani
    2018-10-17 21:14

    Erickson is a scholar. This book is a must for any student of Christian Doctrine. If you are looking for a systematic with a philosophical spin, Erickson is your man. If you are looking for a systematic to read with someone who is new to the faith or new to learning doctrine, I would go for Grudem. Erickson is better understood by people who have a working knowledge in Christian Theology. His companion, abridged version to this book is really helpful as well!I did not read it cover to cover. I have read decent portions of it, probably like 60-70 percent.Overall a great systematic, one that I will continue to go to on a regular basis.

  • Nathan Parker
    2018-11-02 14:56

    I read the third edition of the book. Ericsson does an excellent, detailed job in his discussion on Systematic Theology. This book also makes an excellent resource for searching for content for Systematic Theology papers and research. I am not sure if I would use it in my Systematic Theology classes as a primary textbook due to the fact it is difficult to test/quiz students on. The information can be difficult to find in printed volumes, and students could become a little overwhelmed being tested or quizzed on it. However, in terms of reading it as a supplemental textbook or for research purposes, it is a solid resource.

  • Victor
    2018-11-01 15:57

    Erickson takes a simple, straightforward approach: he describes the basic theological positions on an issue as clearly as possible, and then he explains his position. I don't agree with every one of Erickson's conclusions, and you probably won't either. But where we differ (on baptism, for instance), I could recognize my position in his descriptions. This is what Tim Keller calls "Gillespie's Rule B: Represent and engage your opponents’ position in its very strongest form, not in a weak ‘straw man’ form." It's a mark of careful, irenic scholarship, and it only deepens my respect for Erickson and his work.

  • G Walker
    2018-10-30 16:00

    I don't get how this is a standard across the board. Erickson is a good and clear communicator, but as a definitive text that I would want my students to wade through (wasting a ton of time in the process - this is a big book), I just don't see it. He had his place and time, and is worthy of respect... and while I would choose this text over Berkhof or Grudem, I still think there are MANY better texts out there that would (even if/where one would disagree) stimulate one's mind and heart in a more beneficial manner - not just in content but also in methodology.

  • Ben
    2018-11-13 13:10

    This is an exhaustive book on systematic theology. The author rightfully presents and argues for his views for each subtopic, but does a noteworthy job of explaining the history of each subtopic as well as fairly and accurately presenting other views. This is a must have for folks interested in systematic theology. Not all of the sections will appeal equally, but it is a great reference to have.

  • Josiah
    2018-11-04 18:18

    Good systematic theology book that takes a fair look at the issues. The basic format of each chapter is to take a quick overview of the major positions on each topic before Erickson gives his own view on the issue. While I didn't agree with all of Erickson's conclusions, particularly as he began discussing the Church and the End Times, I appreciated how he presented all the arguments for each issue before giving his own opinion. 4 stars.

  • David Goetz
    2018-11-07 20:06

    I read the second edition a few years ago, and it felt a little dated; the third presumably accounts for theological and philosophical work (Erickson does an excellent job of addressing pertinent philosophical questions) done since the second edition came out. On the whole, Erickson is wonderful. He's a baptist who rejects particular atonement but otherwise defends the Calvinist understanding of Holy Scripture.

  • Sorta Anita
    2018-10-18 17:05

    This book helps Christian scholars to have better understanding on Christian Theology. It contains a detail information from different Christian scholars as well as practitioners. We need to read it at least twice on its particular subject since this book contains many Christian terminologies. But the author provides its meanings in the appendix, glossary. etc.It's good to read this book along with Wayne Grudem (Another Christian Theology book.

  • Peter Fick
    2018-11-08 18:18

    This book is impressive in its detailed treatment of so many central theological issues, with up to date examples. It is very accessible and never becomes dull. The sheer size of the book is a bit intimidating. I would recommend everyone who's really interested in theological issues to at least read one chapter to discover how wonderfully written this book is. Five stars; each of them fully deserved!

  • Carol
    2018-11-01 16:07

    The book was far too cumbersome in different ways. The sheer bulk of it does not make for portable reading. Along with that is the academic language which makes it difficult to understand the point of each chapter. This text is most likely meant for advanced academic classes in Christian-Religious studies, but it is only useful in the academic arena. There are many other, and far simpler, ways to convey a point of view, or historical fact, no matter what topic you are studying.